A Comparison of Zooplankton Assemblages in a Coastal Upwelling and Offshore Station in East Sulu Sea

  • Cristy S Acabado OceanBio Laboratory
  • Wilfredo L. Campos OceanBio Laboratory
  • Mary Mar P. Noblezada OceanBio Laboratory
  • DM G. Estremadura OceanBio Laboratory

Abstract

Partially enclosed marine basins often display characteristic pelagic faunal compositions reflecting their distinctive hydrographic conditions. Seasonal upwelling along the northern coast of the Zamboanga Peninsula in East Sulu Sea results to the high fisheries production in the area likely by enhancing local plankton abundance. Zooplankton in this area were investigated during the Joint PhilEx oceanographic cruise on board the R/V Melville in December 2007. Data on the abundance and vertical distribution of major groups of zooplankton were analyzed and compared between two sets of MOCNESS samples collected from a coastal upwelling station and the other from an offshore station. Eighty four (84) zooplankton taxa belonging to 20 major groups were identified in the coastal station, while ninety five (95) taxa under 28 major groups were found in the offshore station. The total zooplankton density was much higher in the coastal station (98.9 ind./m

3) than in the offshore station (47.5 ind./m3). Copepods dominated in both stations, comprising up to 70% of the total zooplankton. No distinct variation in the abundance, composition and distribution of zooplankton with depth was observed except in 150 – 200 m depth stratum in the coastal station wherein a dramatic increase in the abundance of copepods, ostracods and chaetognaths was noted. In the offshore station, the crustaceans also showed a drastic increase in abundance in the 50 – 100 m depths. These appear to be related to the thermocline in both stations, where typically higher upper layer primary productivity can support dense communities of zooplankton.

Published
2011-03-15
Issue
Vol 22 No 2 (2010)
Section
Articles

Keywords

upwelling; thermocline; zooplankton; Sulu Sea
Submission of a manuscript implies: that the work described has not been published before (except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture, review, or thesis); that it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere; that its publication has been approved by all co-authors, if any, as well as by the responsible authorities at the institute where the work has been carried out; that, if and when the manuscript is accepted for publication, the authors agree to the automatic transfer of the copyright to the publisher; that the manuscript will not be published elsewhere in any language without the consent of the copyright holders; that written permission of the copyright holder is obtained by the authors for material used from other copyrighted sources; and that any costs associated with obtaining this permission are the authors’ responsibility.