Comparison of Conventional Plate Assays with DNA-based Screening Protocols for Protease and Cellulase Production from Putative Bacillus Isolates
Abstract
Putative Bacillus isolates obtained from mud and soil samples of Mt. Makiling, Los Baños, Laguna were screened for the production of either cellulase or alkaline protease using cellulose and casein plate assays, respectively. Five out of eight isolates assayed for cellulase activity tested positive. DNA from these eight samples were extracted using the modified ROSE method for slot blot hybridization with cellulase gene probe. Out of the five samples positive for the cellulose plate assay, only three exhibited hybridization results. DNA from the eight isolates were used as templates for PCR amplification using primers specific for B. subtilis cellulase gene. Out of the eight isolates, two produced the expected 350-bp cellulose amplicon. Another set of ten putative Bacillus isolates were screened for the production of alkaline protease using casein plate assay. Four isolates exhibited protease activity. Genomic DNA extracted from ten isolates were subjected to slot blot hybridization using a fragment of alkaline protease gene from B. pumilus. Five isolates, of which four previously tested positive for protease activity, showed positive hybridization signals. PCR analysis using primers designed based on alkaline protease gene of B. pumilus showed that only one isolate produced the expected 320-bp PCR amplicon. These data suggest that biochemical plate assays may be advantageous for isolating bacteria that produce different types of cellulose and alkaline protease, while DNA-based methods are useful in detecting specific target genes but may therefore miss out on novel or variant enzymes.
Published
2007-07-02
Issue
Section
Articles
Submission of a manuscript implies: that the work described has not been published before (except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture, review, or thesis); that it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere; that its publication has been approved by all co-authors, if any, as well as by the responsible authorities at the institute where the work has been carried out; that, if and when the manuscript is accepted for publication, the authors agree to the automatic transfer of the copyright to the publisher; that the manuscript will not be published elsewhere in any language without the consent of the copyright holders; that written permission of the copyright holder is obtained by the authors for material used from other copyrighted sources; and that any costs associated with obtaining this permission are the authors’ responsibility.