Comparative Use of Meristic and Geomorphometric Analyses of Vegetative and Floral Characters in Studying Intraspecific Variation in Portulaca grandiflora (Hook)

  • Athena Jan F. Valenzuela University of the Philippines
  • Brian S.Santos S. Santos University of the Philippines
  • Jonas P. Quilang1 P. Quilang University of the Philippines
  • Ernelea P. Cao University of the Philippines

Abstract

Meristic and geometric morphometric analyses were applied to 150 Portulaca grandiflora (Hook) specimens in order to examine shape variations in vegetative and floral characters between and among the morphotypes of the species. Canonical Variate Analysis of both meristic and geomorphometric data show significant (p<0.05 and p<0.01, respectively) variation of leaf shape, specifically that of the petiole shape, between “single” flowered and “double” flowered varieties. Plants with single flowers possess leaves that are generally wider, especially toward the apex, while those of plants with double flowers are narrower. Differences were also observed in the size and shape of the petiole such that “double” flowered varieties had a more distinct petiole compared to the “single” flowered varieties. Petal shape was also significantly variable between the two varieties. Principal Component Analysis of both meristic and geomorphometric data also show significant variation within the individuals which may explain the occurrence of the different morphotypes of the plant. Cluster Analysis using meristic data again showed separation between “single” flowered and “double” flowered varieties and further separation between petal colors. In general, meristic and geomorphometric data showed comparable results. Description of shape variation in the vegetative and floral characters studied was consistent in the different analyses used.
Issue
Vol 23 No 2 (2011)
Section
Articles
Submission of a manuscript implies: that the work described has not been published before (except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture, review, or thesis); that it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere; that its publication has been approved by all co-authors, if any, as well as by the responsible authorities at the institute where the work has been carried out; that, if and when the manuscript is accepted for publication, the authors agree to the automatic transfer of the copyright to the publisher; that the manuscript will not be published elsewhere in any language without the consent of the copyright holders; that written permission of the copyright holder is obtained by the authors for material used from other copyrighted sources; and that any costs associated with obtaining this permission are the authors’ responsibility.